 |

|
Could you elaborate on the alleged
Monotheistic of the Maronites? |
The season of Advent |
Why do communicants answer "Amen"
when receiving Communion? |
Why was Jesus
Baptized? |
Why
is it that thieves, murderers, child molesters, and others who break
God’s law can receive the Eucharist, but the divorced person or
someone married to a divorced person is denied Holy Communion? |
Being a Maronite Catholic. Is there a
church law that states that we as Catholics must belong to a
particular parish? |
The
National Conference of Bishops that met in Atlanta several weeks ago
chose not to address many vital issues facing the Roman Catholic
Church. One important issue is the roll of women in the Catholic
Church. What roll do women actually play in the Catholic
Church of today? |
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]
 |
|
|
Could you
elaborate on the alleged Monotheistic of the Maronites?
Answer: In
the 7th century, the Byzantine Emperor Heraclius desired to
unify Christian belief and thereby strengthen his Empire. In an
attempt to compromise between the Chalcedonians and anti-Chalcedonians
with the aid of the Patriarch of Constantinople, he arrived at the
formula of a “unique operation” in the person of Christ. In 680
A.D., at the Council of Constantinople, (which no Bishop from Syria
was able to attend), the discussion centered on the two wills in
Christ, rather than his “unique operation.” In this the Council
was following the example of the Synod of Rome of 649 and the desire
of Pope Martin I.
In regard to the Maronites, it must
be noted that the discussion concerning the existence of the two wills
in Christ did not reach Lebanon and Syria before the year 727.
Therefore the Maronites could not have been involved in the debate in
the 7th century concerning the wills of Christ, nor could
the Council of Constantinople have been concerned with them.
During this time, religious battles
had reached a culmination of irreducible hostility between the various
Christian denominations within the Patriarchate of Antioch.
Chalcedonians, Nestorians and Jacobites formed three rival churches.
The followers of two natures in Christ, standing in the middle between
the other two groups, were always afraid to go too far, even to
excessive language. Since they did not know about the Council of
Constantinople, they lived according to the first five councils,
especially Chalcedon. When, in the 8th century, prisoners
brought into Syria spoke of “two wills,” the Maronites, accustomed
to only one phraseology, saw in their teaching a dualism in Christ.
For them, this was Nestorianism. On the other hand, Maronite
liturgical books clearly speak of a complete human nature in Christ,
with all that entails. Their only difficulty was with any teaching
that might imply a conflict in the two wills of Christ. There is no
evidence that the Maronites ever stood in opposition to any of the
conciliar teachings of the Church once they were informed of them.
Note: for a more detailed description of
this issue see “History of the Maronite Church” by Msgr. Peter
Dib.
|
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]

|
The season of Advent:
Answer: Advent is the time in
which we are to restore Jesus to the center of the Christmas
celebration, this is the time in which we sing read and talk about
Jesus’ birth. A time when all of the family should gather around the
Christmas tree, in observance of the Birth of Jesus Christ and find
the observance meaningful. The props are simple and inexpensive. The
memories and training will last a lifetime. Although many churches
share the common doctrine, each family can add its own flavor. The
season of the announcements (Advent) started on Sunday November 19 in
the Maronite Church when we celebrated the Announcement to
Zechariah.
In the Western (Latin) rite, December 3rd
would be their beginning of the Advent season, because Christmas falls
on different days each year, Advent can last 22 to 28 days. In the
Maronite tradition the Advent wreath and candles are not used. The
Latin Rite Catholics use the Wreath and Candles. If I remember
correctly we had five candles, three were purple, one rose and one
white candle. The first day of Advent we would light the first purple
candle known as the prophecy candle, read a verse from the scripture
recite some prayers, and after the prayers one of the children would
blow out the candle, this we would repeat each day of the week for the
entire season of Advent. The second Sunday we would relight the first
candle and light the second purple candle, that candle was known as
the Bethlehem Candle. Read from the scripture and recite more prayers.
The third week we would light two purple candles and the rose candle,
Rose is a sign of joy and hope that our Lord is coming. We then lit
the last purple candle on the fourth week, known as the angel candle
all four candles are lit each night that week to symbolize the growing
brightness of Jesus’ coming. Christmas Eve is when we light the
white candle; this candle is the pure candle, the birth of our Lord
Candle. This is Our Lord’s birthday and we should all sing Happy
Birthday to Jesus. |
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]

|
Why do communicants answer "Amen"
when receiving Communion? |
|
Answer:
Answering, “Amen before receiving
communion is not an option, it is a clear directive of the Roman
Catholic, and Maronite Church. It constitutes a profession of faith in
the Lord’s Real Presence under the form of bread and wine. The
current formula for distribution and reception of Holy Communion goes
all the way back to St. Augustine.
|
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]

|
Why was Jesus
Baptized?
|
|
Answer: The baptism given by St John
the Baptist was a baptism unto repentance, however, we also know that,
being divine Jesus had no sin and thus needed no such baptism. In the
encounter between Our Lord and His cousin, as recorded in the Sacred
Scriptures, we find John protesting that Jesus should baptize him, not
the other way around. Our Lord’s response was simply that John
should cooperate “ so that all righteousness might be fulfilled”.
Throughout His earthly life Jesus was intent on fulfilling every
precept of the Law. He who had no need to be made a son of the
covenant through circumcision was circumcised on the eighth day. He
who had no need to be presented to the Father in the Temple was
nonetheless presented on the fortieth day. He, who had no sin of which
to repent, was baptized by John in the River Jordan. All this by way
of example for us, thus teaching us the holiness of God’s Law and
the importance of humble submission and obedience to it.
|
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]

|
Why
is it that thieves, murderers, child molesters, and others who break
God’s law can receive the Eucharist, but the divorced person or
someone married to a divorced person is denied Holy Communion?
|
|
Answer:
In your list of malefactors you must include the
word repentant. Also, before any explanation is
begun, it must be understood that divorce by itself dues not
necessarily bar anyone from Communion. It is remarriage without
annulment of the first marriage that invokes the penalty.
In
the present social and religious upheaval, divorces are becoming
almost as numerous as marriages. The Church marriage laws that once
seemed right and reasonable to most persons of good will now affect
the lives of Catholics who can’t always see how the law is being
fair to them.
The
catch is, of course, that anyone entering on a remarriage unblessed
by the Church is entering into a perduring state of disobedience
to that Church. The other sinners you mentioned can repent, confess,
and return to Communion. The invalidly married person cannot give up
the sin without giving up the marriage, which often (when children
are involved) seems morally impossible.
But
the Church cannot admit to Communion those in invalid marriages
without utterly destroying the teaching that sacramental marriage is
one of the channels of grace established by Christ. The Church was
given authority by Christ to determine which marriages are channels of
grace and which are not. The dilemma for the invalidly married is that
no matter how good their intentions are they cannot obey and disobey
at the same time.
The
Church is trying to meet the crisis by examining first-marriage
contracts more carefully and granting annulments when they are found
not to be, let us say, of sacramental quality. It is requiring
expressed comprehension of the meaning of the sacramental contract,
rather than assuming it or accepting a perfunctory written promise
about observing Christian marriage essentials. It is educating
Catholics about the seriousness of the Catholic marriage contract.
But
what it cannot do is call disobedience obedience or abdicates the
authority and responsibility given it by God. The ultimate consolation
of those in unabandonable invalid marriages is that Holy Communion
is not necessary for salvation, and that the public penance endured by
exclusion from Communion will not be overlooked in the judgment of God.
|
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]

|
Being a Maronite Catholic. Is there
a church law that states that we as Catholics must belong to a
particular parish?
|
| Answer:
Cannon law 518 says the
following: As a general rule a parish is to be territorial, that is
it embraces all the Christian faithful within a certain territory.
However, personal parishes are to be established based upon Rite,
Language, and the nationality of the Christian Faithful within some
territory or even upon some other determining factor. So, Yes, the
church considers the parish to be the basic cell of ecclesial life and
even if the membership is not rooted in territoriality, it should be a
stable and ongoing reality.
|
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]

|
The
National Conference of Bishops that met in Atlanta several weeks ago
chose not to address many vital issues facing the Roman Catholic
Church. One important issue is the roll of women in the Catholic
Church. What roll do women actually play in the Catholic
Church of today?
|
| Answer:
The following is taken from the Handbook for
today’s Catholics. [A Redemptorist Pastoral Publication]
Throughout
the history of the Church, women have always served and ministered.
The Gospels of the Apostles record specific instances of women’s
influence and presence. Prior to Vatican II, women mainly Religious
Sisters, were directly involved in ministry in schools, hospitals,
parishes, orphanages, and other Church – sponsored institutions.
Women’s role in the Church was
specifically addressed in the Vatican II Decree on the Apostolate
of lay people: “ Since in our days women are taking an
increasingly active share in the whole life of society, it is very
important that their participation in the various sectors of the
Church’s apostolate should likewise develop” (9).
Although
women’s participation in some areas needs fuller recognition, in the
past twenty years women have become more actively involved in ministry
and pastoral service. Women are becoming increasingly visible in
liturgical celebrations as readers, Eucharistic ministers, and leaders
of music. Women have always been in the forefront of education in the
church. As more women enroll in advanced degree programs in theology
and pastoral ministry, they can expect to move into leadership roles
in greater numbers. More laywomen serve in academic positions in
colleges and seminaries, as directors of diocesan offices, vicars of
religious, bishops’ assistants, canon lawyers, tribunal members and
in other diocesan administrative positions. In areas where there are
few priests or where priests are available only for periodic
liturgies, women are administering parishes so that a stable presence
of Church is available. Women serve as pastoral ministers, counselors,
hospital chaplains, spiritual directors, and in other ministries not
generally open to the laity before Vatican II. As ministry needs
expand and women become more aware of opportunities to share their
gifts, we can expect to see more women’s leadership roles in Church
Ministry increase even more in the future.
|
|
Back to [Bulletin
Board]
 |
 |
This page last modified on
11/16/05 |
|